![]() Proper grammar is not really a restriction I don’t know why you think following a formal set of rules that can help set the difference between being perceived as professional and illiterate is comparable to being ignorant. I will not argue with someone that changes their own argument after every rebuttal. Also, can you please stop changing your message? You switch from one argument to the next almost like you are grasping at straws. Ren is a Confucian value about respecting fellow peers that you evidently lack. “Racquet” did not come about until the 1800s, and even then it was just a variant of “racket.” Reply The OED has examples of “racket” used in sports-related contexts from as far back as the 15o0s, and the spelling was around for hundreds of years before anyone used “racquet” (itself a misspelling of the French word). In fact, the spelling predates the United States. It shows that “tennis racket” has prevailed since the early 20th century.Ģ. ![]() There’s also this Ngram, which charts the phrases’ use in British books published from 1800 to 2000. The ratio is even bigger in Canadian and Australian publications. So the margin of “racket” to “racquet” is almost 3 to 1. publications covering 2000 to the present: There are 49 results.Īnd here’s a similar search for “tennis racket”: . Here’s a search of the phrase “tennis racquet” in various U.K. While some writers outside North America might prefer the French-influenced spelling for the sports equipment, “racket” prevails by a large margin.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |